MapMyExchange

BTCC vs Bybit: futures do not reorder spot.

BTCC is cheaper on the VIP 0 future read in November 2026 than on its own spot. Bybit, in this comparison, supplies crypto-to-crypto spot, not an invented futures fee.

Two products, two figures

Spot: BTCC 0.30% taker and 0.20% maker on the fee page. Bybit 0.1000% and 0.1000% on crypto-to-crypto, VIP 0. On that product Bybit charges less taker. It is not the European 0.2500%.

BTCC futures, VIP 0 on 2 November 2026: 0.055% taker and 0.03% maker. VIP 7 falls to 0.015% and 0.01%. That figure is not compared with Bybit spot to declare a winner. A BTCC guide that still says 0.048% does not replace the schedule.

Copy trading at BTCC and the account at Bybit

BTCC documents futures copy trading at the same fee as the equivalent future, on a fixed or proportional margin. Bybit is not given a copy-trading module that these sources do not describe.

The BTCC contract is with BTCC Limited, Hong Kong, CR No. 1956541. Bybit keeps the global entity distinct from Bybit EU. No authorisation is copied from one brand to the other.

The withdrawal stays outside the table

BTCC, in the academy guide, does not charge a crypto deposit and charges the network on withdrawal. Bybit does not leave a single withdrawal cost in the global spot article.

TradFi at a 0 commission, announced by BTCC for 1 June 2026, is not a deposit and not spot. It is not used to cheapen the 0.30%.

Bybit’s place does not deny BTCC’s future

Bybit is first on the international ranking because of the commercial priority, with a 0.1000% spot taker. BTCC is last on this list because its spot taker is 0.30%.

Someone trading futures on BTCC should not read that last place as a futures fee. The profile separates the two. A visit does not claim admission in the reader’s country.