Decentralized exchanges

Aster review

Aster combines spot and perpetuals around order-book trading. It is relevant when you distinguish resting orders from immediate execution. Fees depend on the product and pair category rather than one rate for the entire platform.

Last updated:

Products
Spot, crypto perpetuals, Group B and RWA
General perpetuals
0% maker / 0.04% taker
Access
Wallet or email route; trading margin
Email funding
USDT on Arbitrum One in the documented flow

Aster spot and perpetuals; market categories kept separate.

Product-specific feesFees with the relevant trading context
Wallets and fundsSignatures, collateral and execution
Editorial analysisFees, products and risks in context

Best of Aster

Spot and derivatives for active order management.

  • Zero ordinary perpetual maker fees in documented categories.
  • Separate spot pricing with an optional ASTER payment discount.
  • Crypto and RWA markets have explicitly different terms.

Areas to improve

Market and access method affect the practical cost.

  • Group B taker pricing is 0.1%, above the general rate.
  • VIP requires both volume and average ASTER balance.
  • Deposit networks depend on the access flow, not the brand alone.

When Aster makes sense

Aster is most relevant when you distinguish supplying resting liquidity from demanding immediate execution. Zero perpetual maker pricing can suit a patient order strategy, but does not guarantee a fill. For an immediate entry, assess the pair’s taker charge and slippage rather than its maker headline.

Spot and perpetuals also serve different goals. Buying an asset to hold is not the same as maintaining leveraged exposure. The spot versus futures guide develops that choice. If you only want to acquire tokens and withdraw them, prioritise the spot funding route over the number of derivatives markets.

Review product terms and risks before trading.

Crypto, Group B and RWA perpetuals

General crypto, Group B and RWA markets have separate rates. Two symbols on one screen may not have the same taker charge. Group B contains designated pairs; newly listed markets should not automatically inherit the general figure in your calculation.

Documented RWA taker pricing is 1.25 basis points, or 0.0125%, under terms effective from 7 September 2026. A derivative gives exposure rather than ownership of the reference asset. This matters if your goal is to receive and transfer an asset rather than hold a contract.

USD1 is also used for selected quoted markets. The documented BTC, ETH and SOL block uses 0.04% taker, while RWA in USD1 uses 0.0125%. A different stablecoin in a symbol is not enough to transfer another contract’s terms. Read the full denomination and collateral requirement.

Execution examples on 1,000 USDT

General crypto perpetuals list 0% maker and 0.04% starting taker. A hypothetical 1,000 USDT taker fill costs 0.40 USDT. Entering and exiting the same notional totals 0.80 USDT of execution, before funding and market results. Recalculate if position size changes.

Group B uses 0.1% taker: 1 USDT per 1,000 USDT fill, or 2 USDT for an equal-sized entry and exit. Repeating a strategy magnifies the difference from the general example. A small percentage is not necessarily a small monthly cost.

RWA at 0.0125% costs 0.125 USDT per 1,000 USDT in this hypothetical unit. That figure is not the general crypto perpetual rate. Spread and market depth can differ between products even when example notionals are identical.

Spot charges 0.005% maker and 0.04% taker: 0.05 and 0.40 USDT on 1,000 USDT. An enabled 5% ASTER payment discount reduces a 0.40 USDT spot fee to 0.38 USDT. It does not remove five percentage points from the notional. Consider whether holding the token is worthwhile for the actual saving.

Fees by product
Product or movementPublished terms
General crypto perpetuals0% maker; 0.04% taker, subject to VIP level.
Group B crypto perpetuals0% maker; 0.1% taker, subject to VIP level.
RWA perpetuals0% maker; 0.0125% taker (1.25 bps), equal across VIP levels.
Spot0.005% maker; 0.04% taker.
Spot paid with ASTER5% fee discount when enabled with sufficient balance.
Funding and liquidationContract-specific terms, outside these execution rates.

Understanding VIP conditions

VIP combines fourteen-day spot and perpetual volume with average daily ASTER holdings. Both conditions matter. Daily evaluation occurs at 23:59 UTC, so a single token purchase should not be confused with satisfying an average-balance requirement. Staking can contribute to the balance definition.

Budget using ordinary pricing first. Holding more capital or creating turnover merely to qualify for a saving may cost more than it saves. Numerical tier thresholds not reliably transcribed are not assigned here.

Zero maker perpetual pricing does not extend to spot and does not convert taking liquidity into maker execution. The market and limit order guide explains why a crossing limit can pay taker.

Access and preparing a deposit

Wallet access includes MetaMask, Binance Wallet and WalletConnect-compatible options; email access also exists. The consulted email route specifies USDT on Arbitrum One. Do not apply that route to every wallet or chain. Follow the asset/network combination shown for the chosen funding method.

USDT, USDC and USD1 are different balances despite their dollar references. The same stablecoin on another blockchain also requires the appropriate route. If funding from a CEX, check its withdrawal network against the destination. The transfer guide helps organise this step.

Keep network costs separate from trading fees. An authentication signature differs from a token transfer. Once credited, decide what capital belongs in margin and what stays outside the strategy. Returning to your wallet requires reviewing free balance and exposure; disconnection does not close trades.

Spot decisions and perpetual position sizing

For spot, assess the asset received after execution and your intended use. For perpetuals, assess notional, collateral and tolerable price movement. Hypothetical exposure of 3,000 USDT backed by 600 USDT is five times the allocated capital. A 2% move represents 60 USDT before costs. Zero maker fees do not remove that relationship.

Check direction, market, size and price before submitting. A resting limit can be partially filled, leaving an active remainder. When reducing a position, verify the remaining size rather than interpreting any execution as a full exit.

Funding and liquidation belong to the individual contract; there is no fixed brand-wide percentage assigned here. The funding guide explains how holding time changes cost. Free liquidity can become important when the market moves, even if the opening order initially fits the account.

Access permissions and deposited collateral

Wallet login does not mean all trading capital remains freely spendable outside the system. Separate access keys, granted permissions and committed collateral. Email-based recovery also needs its own plan rather than assuming it behaves exactly like an existing browser wallet.

Inspect the domain, requested action and network before signing. The security guide covers useful habits, while wallet use adds signature review to password management. Access protection and margin management address different problems; neither replaces the other.

Alternative execution models

Hyperliquid combines spot and perpetual books with distinct schedules and HYPE staking discounts. Lighter contrasts regular Standard orders without maker/taker charges against latency and paid methods. Choose by execution needs rather than each platform’s smallest isolated figure.

For a centralised account and bundled tools, consider Bybit or Bitget. For simple wallet swaps, Uniswap’s pool model answers another need. Aster is most relevant when order books and derivative positions are the goal, rather than as an obligatory detour for every token purchase.

Who may find it suitable?

Aster combines spot and perpetuals around order-book trading. It is relevant when you distinguish resting orders from immediate execution. Fees depend on the product and pair category rather than one rate for the entire platform.

Our review of Aster

Aster is interesting if you use maker orders and want spot beside perpetuals. Its useful feature is a choice of methods rather than a universal low rate. Frequent taker traders should identify the market category first: applying the general 0.04% to Group B produces the wrong budget.

Related guides

Explore guides
Guide

Spot vs crypto futures: differences and examples

Compare spot buying and futures: asset ownership, margin, leverage, liquidation and holding costs, with practical worked examples.

Read guide
Guide

Market vs limit orders in crypto trading

Understand market and limit orders, order-book depth, partial fills, post-only settings and stops through practical crypto examples.

Read guide
Guide

What is the funding rate in perpetual futures?

Learn who pays funding, how to calculate it on notional exposure and how to compare rates and intervals separately from trading fees.

Read guide

Frequently asked questions

Does zero maker pricing include spot?

No. Documented spot maker pricing is 0.005%. Zero maker applies to the perpetual categories identified here.

What is the taker rate?

General crypto is 0.04%, Group B 0.1%, and RWA 0.0125% under the collected terms. VIP can affect crypto taker pricing.

What does VIP require?

Both fourteen-day volume and average ASTER holdings. Neither trading volume alone nor a one-off token purchase should be assumed sufficient.

Can I deposit any USDT?

Do not assume so. The consulted email route specifies USDT on Arbitrum One. Asset, network and access method must match the funding instructions.