Spot against spot, futures against futures
Spot: LBank, taker 0.1%–0.2% and maker 0%–0.2%. BTCC, 0.30% taker and 0.20% maker. LBank’s published ceiling, 0.2%, is still below BTCC’s taker. That does not make LBank cheaper on every pair if the pair is not in the guide, and the guide says the pair controls.
Futures: LBank, taker range 0%–0.1% and an example of 0.06%. BTCC, VIP 0 at a 0.055% taker and a 0.03% maker on 2 November 2026. 0.055% sits inside LBank’s range. A futures winner is not declared from a 2023 example against a 2026 schedule.
Both have copy trading and it is not the same sentence
LBank copies on the futures account, with no added trading fee, and the lead sets the profit share. BTCC charges copy trading as the equivalent future and documents a fixed or proportional margin.
LBank also describes a Visa card and a trading and withdrawal API. BTCC describes a futures demo with 100,000 virtual USDT. Neither has been tested by opening an account for this profile.
Both separate the network from the taker
LBank and BTCC say a crypto deposit carries no platform fee. Both leave the withdrawal on the network fee the screen shows.
Neither supplies a SEPA or SPEI table here. A 0.30% or a 0.2% does not predict what it costs to take USDT out.
After the 0.10%, in this order
On the international ranking they come after Bybit, MEXC and the 0.10% group. LBank precedes BTCC because its published taker band ends at 0.2% and BTCC’s spot is at 0.30%. It is not a quality score.
Bybit stays first because of the commercial priority, at 0.1000% crypto-to-crypto. That priority is not extended to them. Visits are brand links, not country-by-country admission.