Where they meet and where they do not
Bybit, global article of 2 September 2026: VIP 0 on crypto-to-crypto spot, 0.1000% taker and 0.1000% maker. LBank, guide of 18 November 2025: taker 0.1%–0.2% and maker 0%–0.2%, depending on the pair. If the LBank pair is at 0.1%, the taker matches Bybit. If it is at 0.2%, LBank charges more.
Do not use Bybit EU’s 0.2500% or Bybit’s 0.2000% fiat rate for this row. Do not use LBank’s VIP floor, taker from 0.03%, as if it were the entry rate.
Futures and the contract, each in its place
LBank publishes futures on a range, maker 0%–0.02% and taker 0%–0.1%, and an older example of 0.02% / 0.06%. The schedule that orders the ranking is spot. Bybit is not given a futures fee that this pair of sources does not carry.
Global Bybit identifies the international account apart from Bybit EU. LBank identifies LBK Exchange. Neither sentence turns one brand into the other.
Withdrawing is not inside the taker
LBank does not charge a crypto deposit and shows the network fee on withdrawal. Bybit does not publish a single withdrawal cost in the global fee article used here.
An LBank pair at 0.1% can come with an expensive withdrawal, and Bybit’s 0.1000% with a cheap one. Each screen controls.
Why Bybit can lead with a similar taker
On the international ranking Bybit is first because of the owner’s commercial priority. LBank comes after the 0.10% group because its published taker is not a single 0.10% figure.
A visit to each brand follows its own link. It does not claim that the reader’s country is on an admission list. For LBank, the United States, Canada, mainland China and Hong Kong are on both lists in the agreement.