Decentralized exchanges

Extended Exchange review

Extended combines order-book trading with settlement on Arc. Its appeal is execution control, from a basic limit order to TWAP tools, with distinct pricing for ordinary and RWA markets.

Last updated:

Products
Spot and perpetuals; crypto and RWA markets
Base fees
Maker 0% / taker 0.025%; RWA taker 0.010%
Funding
USDC and network-specific assets; margin-dependent withdrawals
Settlement
Arc contracts; committed margin is not free balance

DEX product: its own markets and conditions.

Product-specific feesFees with the relevant trading context
Wallets and fundsSignatures, collateral and execution
Editorial analysisFees, products and risks in context

Best of Extended Exchange

Tools for choosing how each order executes.

  • Market, limit and post-only orders on supported order-book markets.
  • Perpetual-specific TWAP and protective orders.
  • Separate fee schedules and explicitly conditional rebates.

Areas to improve

Flexibility requires understanding product and margin.

  • Maker rebates are not available to every maker.
  • Funding and liquidation add costs and risks to perpetuals.
  • Supported deposit and withdrawal networks differ by asset.

Who Extended may suit

Extended is most relevant to traders who distinguish buying a spot asset from opening perpetual exposure. One produces a balance of the traded asset; the other requires margin and can involve funding and liquidation. Displaying both in one terminal does not make the outcomes interchangeable.

For occasional trades, priorities are the right market, funding and a clean exit without forgotten orders. Active trading places more weight on execution instructions and repeated book-crossing costs. The DEX directory compares this approach with swaps, RFQ and other perpetual models.

Review product terms and risks before trading.

Spot, perpetuals and RWA markets

Current documentation covers spot and perpetuals alongside markets linked to traditional assets. RWA exposure does not imply receiving ownership of the share, index or commodity. Inspect specification, currency, margin and reference before treating an underlying name as shorthand for the product. One contract’s terms do not establish an entire category’s conditions.

Market and limit orders are available for spot and perpetuals. A limit order can rest or execute immediately: maker and taker describe its role in the book, not two separate buttons. Post-only expresses an intention to supply liquidity and may prevent a crossing execution. Reduce-only is a perpetual instruction that prevents an intended close from increasing exposure.

Perpetual conditional orders can trigger from Mark, Index or Last. TWAP distributes execution over time, while scaled orders distribute prices. Neither guarantees improvement or removes market risk. Chase follows the book with a post-only limit; its automation depends on the browser session, and the last order may remain live when tracking pauses. Stopping tracking is not the same as cancelling the order.

Extended also has RFQ markets. Their displayed book is indicative, and user-submitted orders pay taker even when they wait before execution; a resting limit does not automatically become maker. Post-only and Chase do not carry over to that model. Check RFQ versus real order-book execution before interpreting depth, pricing and tools; the API distinguishes this with isRfq.

Ordinary fees, RWA pricing and maker rebates

The published ordinary spot and perpetual schedule lists 0% maker and 0.025% taker. RWA markets currently have discounted 0.010% taker and 0% maker pricing. Do not apply the RWA rate to a crypto market or interpret it as removing all costs. Fees apply to executed notional, which can greatly exceed posted collateral on a leveraged perpetual.

For a hypothetical USD 10,000 notional, a 0.025% taker entry costs USD 2.50. Closing the same notional as taker adds another 2.50, totalling USD 5 before spread and funding. At the documented RWA 0.010% rate, the corresponding figures are USD 1 per side and USD 2 total. This is not an estimate of the entire cost of holding for a week.

Maker rebates depend on share of total maker volume over thirty days across spot and perpetuals. Shares of 0.5%, 1%, 2.5% and 5% qualify for 0.002%, 0.004%, 0.006% and 0.010% respectively. RWA rebates are 60% lower. Placing a maker order alone is insufficient: daily payment additionally requires at least USD 10 accrued over twenty-four hours.

Budget using ordinary product rates first, then spread, applicable funding and funding-route costs. Do not subtract a potential rebate without establishing eligibility. The total-cost guide and funding explanation help separate these components.

Fees by product
Product or movementPublished terms
Ordinary spot/perpsMaker 0%; taker 0.025% on notional.
RWA marketsCurrent discount: maker 0%; taker 0.010%.
Maker rebateConditional on 30-day maker share; daily payment from USD 10.
FundingSeparate from perpetual execution; inspect the market.
Funding routesAsset, network and route dependent.
RFQ marketsUser-submitted orders pay taker even when resting; limit does not imply maker.

Funding, withdrawals and the move to Arc

Extended migrated settlement from Starknet to Arc on 22 October 2026. Current documentation identifies native Arc USDC, wETH as the ETH representation and cirBTC instead of wBTC. New USDT and wBTC deposits were disabled; older instructions do not establish current collateral support. Protocol settlement on Arc does not mean every funding route must originate there.

The EVM flow supports asset-specific chain combinations, including documented USDC routes from Ethereum, Arbitrum and Base. Use the combination generated by your account and inspect destination, asset and estimate. Third-party routes can depend on liquidity and add external costs. Supported tokens do not automatically share every network, and approximate times are not guarantees.

Withdrawable funds also depend on margin needed by positions and orders. Partially closing exposure does not release all collateral. Before withdrawing, inspect positions, pending orders, available amount and receiving-wallet compatibility. Withdrawing to a wallet covers common checks without replacing product-specific instructions.

What you control and what depends on the protocol

The architecture settles movements and trades through Arc contracts with account health checks. Onchain state can be verified, but contract, liquidation and access-path risks remain. Distinguish wallet funds from collateral committed to the protocol. Self-custody does not make open-position margin freely withdrawable at any time.

Limit approvals to what is needed, retain wallet access and inspect orders after disconnection. A forgotten resting limit can execute later. Check protective orders by trigger, size and position effect rather than merely seeing them in a list.

Extended versus other trading models

Hyperliquid offers an order-book and ecosystem reference, while Lighter requires account-specific pricing comparisons. For quote-based execution, Variational Omni costs explains why no trading fee does not mean no spread. Ostium is another traditional-market alternative, with opening and rollover costs rather than an assumed identical maker/taker budget.

Conclusion and first checks

Extended is more compelling as an execution tool than as a promise of free trading. Before a first order, identify spot or perpetual, inspect market and fee category, fund a supported route and review a controlled execution. For longer exposure, include funding and margin. Budget ordinary maker at 0% and only include rebates when your volume actually qualifies.

Who may find it suitable?

Extended combines order-book trading with settlement on Arc. Its appeal is execution control, from a basic limit order to TWAP tools, with distinct pricing for ordinary and RWA markets.

Our review of Extended Exchange

Extended is worth considering for order-book execution, flexible orders and product-specific cost comparisons. A 0% maker rate does not make an immediately executable limit order free: it may be taker. It offers a different price-control model from RFQ and requires more order, collateral and funding management than a simple purchase app.

Related guides

Explore guides
Guide

Spot vs crypto futures: differences and examples

Compare spot buying and futures: asset ownership, margin, leverage, liquidation and holding costs, with practical worked examples.

Read guide
Guide

Market vs limit orders in crypto trading

Understand market and limit orders, order-book depth, partial fills, post-only settings and stops through practical crypto examples.

Read guide
Guide

What is the funding rate in perpetual futures?

Learn who pays funding, how to calculate it on notional exposure and how to compare rates and intervals separately from trading fees.

Read guide

Frequently asked questions

Does Extended still settle on Starknet?

Current documentation places settlement on Arc following the 22 October 2026 migration. Older guides do not establish current deposit support.

Does every trade cost 0.010%?

No. That is the current discounted RWA taker rate; ordinary published taker is 0.025%. Maker is 0% in those schedules.

Does every limit order earn a rebate?

No. It must supply liquidity and meet maker-volume-share conditions. Daily payment additionally requires USD 10 accrued within twenty-four hours.

Can I withdraw all collateral?

Only funds available after margin requirements and obligations. Inspect positions and orders before withdrawing.