MEXC review: spot fees, zones and the entity

The agreement updated on 13 October 2026 says you contract with MEXC (Comoros) Ltd, Boulevard de Coelacanthe, Mutsamudu, Anjouan. We have not verified that company on a Comoros licence register.

The Seychelles FSA identifies MX Global Ltd as the company operating www.mexc.com and states that it has no licence under its virtual-asset provider law. It adds that MEXC Global Ltd was dissolved and did not have one either. We do not equate the two companies or extend the statement to other countries. There is no MEXC row in the MiCA file of 2 November 2026.

A maker, in the guide, is the order that enters the book. A taker is the one that matches at once. The October standard is 0% and 0.05%. Special Rate pairs follow another list and can be more expensive.

From 1 February 2026 the zero maker and taker remains on USDC and on selected pairs. API, institutions, market makers and project teams do not enter that offer. From 30 September, Innovation and MEME+ raise the taker to 0.08% and Assessment to 0.20%, on USDT pairs, with the maker still at 0.00%.

For a pair outside a zone and outside the promotion, the guide uses a 0.05% taker and a 0% maker. If the account can pay with MX, the same text leaves the standard taker at 0.0400%. The general fee page, when read, did not show a usable discount percentage and warns that region controls. We do not invent that discount.

The international ranking places MEXC by that standard 0.05% taker, after Bybit. After does not mean more expensive than Bybit: 0.05% is lower than Bybit’s 0.1000% crypto-to-crypto. Bybit’s first place is the commercial priority and the ranking page says so.

The guide treats a crypto deposit as free on MEXC’s side. A withdrawal pays the network. The article of 12 September 2025 points to the screen for the live figure and adds that sending to another MEXC user carries no fee and is credited quickly.

The agreement says MEXC does not itself provide deposits or withdrawals of fiat currency. There is, in this profile’s sources, no MEXC SEPA or SPEI table we can cite.

Clause 36 of the agreement says MEXC maintains custody of the account’s assets, funds and data, and that it may turn them over to authorities if the account is suspended for fraud or for a breach. It does not promise segregation.

That is not a Seychelles authorisation. The FSA says the opposite about MX Global Ltd and about the former MEXC Global Ltd. Until the contract and the supervisor speak about the same company, authorisation stays unknown.

See whether the pair is standard, USDC under the promotion, or in Innovation, MEME+ or Assessment. The difference between a 0.05%, zero and 0.20% taker is there. If you trade by API, the zero offer does not cover you.

Read the legal name at signup. If it is not MEXC (Comoros) Ltd, this profile does not describe your contract. And confirm that the country is not among those the form rejects: we do not have a closed official list beyond the general clause.

On a standard taker order, 0.05% is half the 0.10% on the other entry schedules in this group. On a maker order, the guide puts 0%. Both sentences have small print: zone, promotion, API and region.

Bybit remains the first card on the international ranking because the owner prioritises that agreement, not because 0.1000% is lower than 0.05%. The Bybit and MEXC comparison develops that contrast.

Binance, Bitget, Gate and KuCoin Class A group at a 0.10% or 0.100% taker. Global Bybit does too, on crypto-to-crypto, and rises to a 0.2000% taker on the first fiat step.

None of those profiles claims that MEXC, or they, are available in every country. The directory and the ranking show availability separately, when the country is known, and leave it unverified when there is no rule.